Skip to main content
· 4/6/2022

Carroll, Jeremy Austin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • statute and its legislative history supported conclusion that utility was required to pay the cost of temporarily relocating and de-energizing power lines to accommodate moving a customer's building
  • statute and its legislative history supported conclusion that utility was required to pay the cost of temporarily relocating and de-energizing power lines to accommodate moving a customer’s building

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.