· 3/13/2009
Carroll College, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Citations
- 385 U.S. App. D.C. 52
- 558 F.3d 568
- 185 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3397
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 5273
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding Board lacked jurisdiction over petitioner despite petitioner’s failure to raise jurisdictional argument before the Board
- “A court can always invalidate Board action that is patently beyond the Board’s jurisdiction, even if the jurisdictional challenge was never presented to the Board.” (citation omitted)
- “A court can always invalidate Board action that is patently beyond the Board’s jurisdiction, even if the jurisdictional challenge was never presented to the Board.” (citation omitted)
- “A court can always invalidate Board action that is patently beyond the Board’s jurisdiction, even if the jurisdictional challenge was never presented to the Board.” (citation omitted)
- “From the Board’s own review of Carroll’s publicly available documents, it should have known immediately that the College was entitled to a Catholic Bishop exemption …. The Board thus had no jurisdiction to order the school to bargain with the union.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henderson, Rogers, Griffith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.