Carroll A. Stanley James O. Hanson Timothy T. Heskett Mark H. Wanta James Rogers Kevin E. Vierra Roberta A. Mulkins v. City of Tracy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that although written policies could have been applied inconsistently with salaried status, “[t]he City has at all relevant times regarded these employees as exempt, and would not have approved suspensions that ... would have jeopardized that status”
• describing “suspensions in full-week increments” as consistent with salaried status
• describing \suspensions in full-week increments\ as consistent with salaried status

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).