Carrithers v. Harrah

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that despite a post-judgment directive to the parties to file additional briefs on the ancillary issue of attorney fees and costs, the trial court’s order disposing of the merits of the case was a final order
• stating that “even if an order -3- granting a final judgment on the merits of a case contains express language indicating that the trial court intends to rule . . ., such language does not negate the fact that such an order is in fact a final judgment”
• “[E]ven if an order granting a final judgment on the merits of a case contains express language indicating that the trial court intends to rule on a request for attorneys’ fees at a future time, such language does not negate the fact that such an order is in fact a final judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).