Carrillo v. Heckler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• hearing officer’s “determination that plaintiffs impairment was severe was implicit in the fact that he reached the issue whether she could return to her prior work”
• reversal and award of benefits at district court level appropriate when ALT ignored court’s instructions on previous remand and took no new evidence
• “[T]he remand order specifically stated the purpose for remand. That purpose did not include reconsideration of the severity of plaintiff's impairments. Reconsideration by the ALJ of that issue, therefore, was inconsistent with and beyond the scope of [the remand] order.”
• “When a remand order specifically states the purpose for remand, ‘it is the duty of the lower court or the agency from which the appeal is taken, to comply with the mandate of the court and to obey the directions therein without variation.’”
• “On the remand of a case after appeal, it is the duty of the lower court or the agency from which the appeal is taken, to comply with the mandate of the court and to obey the directions therein without variation.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).