Skip to main content
· 11/29/1988

Carrigg v. Cordeiro

Citations

  • 530 N.E.2d 809
  • 26 Mass. App. Ct. 611
  • 1988 Mass. App. LEXIS 695

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding handwritten or typewritten terms inserted into a standard form agreement control over the “standard printed form” if the provisions conflict
  • “If ... there is conflict and inconsistency between a printed provision and one that was inserted by the parties especially for the contract that they are then making, the latter should prevail over the former.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kass, Cutter, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.