Skip to main content

Carrigan v. Carrigan

Citations

  • 236 S.W.2d 579
  • 218 Ark. 398
  • 1951 Ark. LEXIS 347

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the strict rule that res judicata applies only to parties or privities can be expanded to include parties or persons who are not technically a party to a judgment but who are connected with it by an interest in the prior litigation and their right to participate therein

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFaddin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Carrigan v. Carrigan

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.