Carriers Insurance Co. v. American Policyholders' Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• criticizing this method as apportioning a greater amount of the loss on the larger insurer regardless of the amount
• “[T]he majority rule amounts to no more than an unacceptable subsidy from the high-coverage to the low-coverage carrier.”
• where there are conflicting excess insurance claim provisions they are to be disregarded as mutually repugnant and each policy is then governed by its general terms
• describing different approaches to determining which insurer should be primary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).