Carrico v. City and County of San Francisco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs’ allegation that “Proposition M was intended to, and does, impact their operations as landlords” was conclusory and insufficient on its own to establish standing
• holding that leave to amend is “properly denied” 5 “if amendment would be futile”
• holding that a conclusory allegation without further elaboration is insufficient to establish standing
• holding that leave to amend is properly denied if amendment would be futile
• holding that leave to amend is properly denied if amendment would be futile
• explaining that leave to amend may be denied if the proposed amendment would be subject to dismissal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).