Carrick v. McFadden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “While the proffer might well have been made less broadly, we are not prepared to say it was insufficient under the circumstances of this case.”
• prior to the enactment of K.S.A. 60-2103 this court consistently held that rulings which had not been specified in the notice of appeal “presented nothing for appellate review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).