Carriage Hills Associates, Inc. v. Municipal Electric Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that where the trial court gave a curative instruction and counsel indicated no desire for further or more specific instructions, appellant acquiesced in the ruling and had no right to complain of it on appeal
• rejecting argument that trial court erred in denying motion for mistrial during a heated exchange between the court and counsel when “appellants acquiesced and did not renew their motion for mistrial after the trial court gave the curative instruction requested by appellants”
• rejecting argument that trial court erred in denying motion for mistrial during a heated exchange between the court and counsel when “appellants acquiesced and did not renew their motion for mistrial after the trial court gave the curative instruction requested by appellants”
• in determining value, jury may appropriately consider all reasonable and probable purposes and uses to which the property might be adapted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).