Carreras v. Sajo, Garcia & Partners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court acted within its discretion when it disregarded additional facts not contained in a separate section
• holding that district court acted within its discretion when it disregarded additional facts not contained in a separate section
• holding that span of four days between requesting reasonable accommodation and being terminated is sufficient to establish prima facie claim but insufficient to prove pretext and retaliatory animus
• noting that, in the employment context, \suspicions raised by temporal proximity 'can be authoritatively dispelled . . . by an employer's convincing account of the legitimate reasons for the firing'\ (ellipses in original
• finding that the existence of a disability is fact- intensive and individualized and in this case, the plaintiff’s diabetes did not qualify as a disability because it did not substantially limit a major life activity
• upholding the district court's decision to disregard additional facts not included in a separate section

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).