Carr v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating in dicta that blood drawn for purpose of determining alcohol and drug content must meet “qualified person” requirement of OCGA § 40-6-392 (a) (2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gaston v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-07-28· cited 12×
• Peek v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2000-03-06· cited 9×
• Glover v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-02-26· cited 7×
• Brahm v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-02-02· cited 6×
• Jackson v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2017-02-15· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Patton v. Bank of LaFayette
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1906-02-19· cited 46×
• Munda v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1984-12-04· cited 30×
• Henderson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1982-04-21· cited 22×
• Harden v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-10-14· cited 16×
• Mable v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1991-06-27· cited 13×
• Corley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-06-05· cited 8×