Carr v. Quigley
Citations
- 79 Cal. 130
- 21 P. 607
- 1889 Cal. LEXIS 683
Syllabus
<p>Public Lands—Railroad Grant—Mexican Grant—Validity oe Patent. — A patent issued to the Central Pacific Railroad Company, as the successor in interest of the Western Pacific Railroad Company, under the acts of July 1, 1862, and July 2, 1864, for land within the exterior limits of a Mexican grant which was sub judice when the lands included in the railroad grant were withdrawn from entry and sale, is void as to such land, it being a “government reservation” within the meaning of the act of 1864.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]e do not reach constitutional questions which have not been considered and distinctly ruled on by the trial court.”
- \[W]e do not reach constitutional questions which have not been considered and distinctly ruled on by the trial court.\
- “[W]e do not reach constitutional questions which have not been considered and distinctly ruled on by the trial court.”
- “Davis ID. 2 Jordan v. Atlanta Neighborhood Housing Sues., 251 Ga. 37, 37-38 (302 SE2d 568) (1983). 3 E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. Waters, 298 Ga. App. 843, 845 (1), n. 2 (681 SE2d 651) (2009). 4 Sorrentino v. Boston Mut. Life Ins. Co., 206 Ga. App. 771, 772 (2) (426 SE2d 594) (1992
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beatty, Paterson, Thornton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.