Carr v. Lee J. Behl Hotel Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that neither the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment nor Article I, § 2 of the Constitution \guarantee against errors in the administration of an election\
• holding that there is no due process claim to contest errors in the administration of a congressional election if a fair and adequate state procedure for redress exists, regardless of whether the plaintiff is able to take advantage of the state remedy
• requiring a showing of “intentional or purposeful discrimination” to make out an equal protection claim in the election context
• \Uneven or erroneous application of an otherwise valid statute constitutes a denial of equal protection only if it represents 'intentional or purposeful discrimination.\
• \Uneven or erroneous application of an otherwise valid statute constitutes a denial of equal protection only if it represents 'intentional or purposeful discrimination.' \
• \[u]neven or erroneous application of an otherwise valid statute constitutes a denial of equal protection only if it represents intentional or purposeful discrimination\ [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).