Carr v. Holt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even if there is no independent duty to account, a servicemember who lies in an oral statement to a law enforcement agent conducting an investigation as part of his duties has violated Article 107
• construing Art. 107 ... consistent with the construction of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 in United States v. Rodgers, 466 U.S. 475, 480, 104 S.Ct. 1942, 1946-47, 80 L.Ed.2d 492 (1984)
• “even if not subject to an independent ‘duty to account,’ a service member who lies to a law enforcement agent conducting an investigation as part of his duties has violated Article 107”
• nature of “officiality” regarding false official statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).