Skip to main content
· 10/23/1989

Carr v. Downing

Citations

  • 565 A.2d 181
  • 388 Pa. Super. 195
  • 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3189

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the time period for purposes of Rule 227.1 did not commence until notice of the adjudication was sent to the parties”
  • where no objection from opposing party to untimeliness of the filing of a post-trial motion has been raised, court may deem it timely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Olszewski, Sole, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.