Carr v. Deeds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that failure to disclose under Rule 26 “undermines the district court’s management of the case.”
• “To be sure, plaintiff’s allegations in this case are most serious, but they are equally serious for both sides of this controversy.”
• \Excessive force claims of pretrial detainees are governed by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.\
• “[T]he plaintiff was just way late in naming an expert in this case.... [W]e have those deadlines so we can move in an orderly fashion. And the lateness with which the expert was identified would not allow that to happen.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).