Carr v. Carr
Citations
- 88 Va. 735
- 14 S.E. 368
- 1892 Va. LEXIS 26
Syllabus
<p>Judicial Sales. — Confirmation—Cane at bar. — Until confirmation, a judicial sale is an incomplete bargain. Whether the court will confirm the sale, must depend, in a great measure, on the circumstances of each case. Either party may object; and purchaser, becomes' a party to the suit, and may have any mistake corrected by the court;</p> <p>Held :</p> <p>Under the circumstances of this case, there is no error in the refusal to confirm.</p>
Judges: Lacy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Daniel v. LeitchSupreme Court of Virginia· 1856-03-01· cited 51×
- Berlin v. MelhornSupreme Court of Virginia· 1881-09-15· cited 33×
- Langyher v. Patterson & BashSupreme Court of Virginia· 1883-05-03· cited 27×
- Halbert v. McCullochCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1861-11-11· cited 12×
- Roudabush v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia· 1879-12-04· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.