Carpenters Southern California Administrative Corporation v. Majestic Housing, a California Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “mere reference” to a collective bargaining agreement does not confer fed- eral question jurisdiction under section 301(a)
• case also involved ERISA preemption issue, which we expressly declined to address due to lack of jurisdiction
• where amount of lien is determined by CBA but rights and liabilities of parties governed by state statute, no preemption or jurisdiction under section 301
• finding no preemption in area of traditional state regulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).