Carpenters Local Union No. 345 v. Rubin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that since the publicity was twelve weeks old at the time the jury was empaneled, it was highly unlikely that it was retained in the jurors’ memories
• as applied to murder, robbery and burglary
• discussing efficacy of limiting instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).