Skip to main content
· 11/6/1951

Carpenters' Local 1686 v. Wallis

Citations

  • 237 P.2d 905
  • 205 Okla. 285
  • 1951 OK 293
  • 1951 Okla. LEXIS 671

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “As a general rule, anticipated profits of a business are too remote and speculative to warrant a judgment for their loss”
  • As a general rule, anticipated profits of a business are too remote and speculative to warrant a judgment for their loss; the exception to this rule is that lost profits from an established business may be recovered.
  • As a general rule, anticipated profits of a business are too remote and speculative to warrant a judgment for their loss; the exception to this rule is that lost profits from an established business may be recovered.
  • “[T]he exception to the rule is that the loss of profits from a tortious interruption of an established business may be recovered where it is made reasonably certain, by competent proof, what the amount of the loss actually is.... ”
  • barricade built in front of tenant's cafe and construction
  • remodeling conducted without consent of tenant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.