Carpenter v. STOP-N-GO MARKETS OF GA.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting the “majority view” in holding that there is “no duty owed by a convenience store owner, to persons inside the store, to erect barriers in order to prevent vehicles from driving through the store’s plate glass window”
• convenience store owner owed no duty to erect barriers preventing vehicles from driving through the store’s plate glass window
• no duty to protect against vehicular crashes into a convenience store even though a car had previously jumped the curb and struck the store front of the store
• no duty to protect against vehicular crashes into a convenience store even though a car had previously jumped the curb and struck the store front of the store
• “no duty owed by a convenience store owner, to persons inside the store, to erect barriers in order to prevent vehicles from driving through the store’s plate glass window”
• “no duty owed by a convenience store owner, to persons inside the store, to erect barriers in order to prevent vehicles from driving through the store’s plate glass window”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).