Carpenter v. Reynolds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that by dismissing a habeas petition without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies, it “enables [a petitioner] to file a future petition without being barred by the AEDPA’s prohibition on second or successive petitions”
• dismissing petition that contained only unexhausted claims because “the Court has no basis to retain jurisdiction while [petitioner] pursues exhaustion”
• dismissing a petition without prejudice for failure to exhaust when, “with reasonable certainty,” it appeared that Petitioner could take advantage of “various stays and tolling provisions of the [AEDPA] limitations period” to ensure that any subsequently-filed habeas petition was timely filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).