Skip to main content
· 10/26/2004

Carpenter v. Law Offices of Dressler & Associates, LLC

Citations

  • 858 A.2d 820
  • 85 Conn. App. 655
  • 2004 Conn. App. LEXIS 448

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The jurisdiction a trial court has over an apportionment claim differs from 9 Plaintiff further argues that § 52–102b(a) is a procedural rule that conflicts with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 14. Therefore, Plaintiff claims, Rule 14 must apply instead of § 52–102b(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: DiPENTIMA, DiPentima, McLachlan, Peters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.