Carpenter v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.
Citations
- 7 S.D. 584
- 64 N.W. 1120
- 1895 S.D. LEXIS 114
Syllabus
<p>To establish a plea of accord and satisfaction under the statute, it must not only appear that there was an agreement to accept, in full settlement of an obligation, something different from or less than that to which one of the parties thereto is entitled, but it must be shown that such agreement has been fully executed, and the obligation extinguished by the creditor’s actual acceptance of the consideration specified in the agreement constituting an accord.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.</p>
Judges: Fullee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Barbarich v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court· 1932-03-22· cited 15×
- Arnett v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1902-01-17· cited 13×
- Eggland v. SouthSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1908-11-25· cited 4×
- Webster v. McLarenNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1909-11-06· cited 4×
- South Dakota Board of Regents ex rel. Black Hills State University v. Global Synthetics Environmental, LLCD. South Dakota· 2017-09-15· cited 2×
- Bloomer v. CistCourt of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County· 1897-04-15
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Carpenter v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.