Skip to main content

Carpenter v. Carpenter

Citations

  • 474 A.2d 1124
  • 326 Pa. Super. 570
  • 1984 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4331

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • under UCCJA, home state Pennsylvania required to stay proceedings once informed of prior Massachusetts proceedings
  • under section 6(c) of UCCJA, home state court not required to exercise jurisdiction even when substantial evidence is in that state
  • custody order was issued by Massachusetts court and Pennsylvania court properly relinquished jurisdiction of later custody action
  • since order vacating earlier award of temporary custody and staying custody proceedings on ground that Massachusetts court was already exercising its jurisdiction, the appellant was precluded from litigating the case in Pennsylvania, and order appealed was a final order
  • since order vacating earlier award of temporary custody and staying custody proceedings on ground that Massachusetts court was already exercising its jurisdiction, the appellant was precluded from litigating the case in Pennsylvania, and order appealed was a final order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Brosky, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.