Skip to main content
· 11/30/1896

Carothers v. Mayer

Citations

  • 164 U.S. 325
  • 17 S. Ct. 106
  • 41 L. Ed. 453
  • 1896 U.S. LEXIS 1866

Syllabus

<p>In an action of ejectment in a state court by a plaintiff claiming real estate under a patent from the United States for a mining claim, a ruling by the state court that the statute of limitations .did not begin to run against the claim until the patent had been issued presents no Federal question.</p> <p>So, too, a ruling that matters alleged as an estoppel having taken place before the time when plaintiffs made their application for a patent, and notice of such application having been given, all adverse claimants were given an opportunity to contest the applicant’s right to a patent, and that, the patent having been issued, it was too late to base a defence upon facts existing prior thereto, presents no Federal question.</p>

Judges: Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.