Skip to main content
· 3/3/1995

Carolyn LIDGE-MYRTIL, Appellant, v. DEERE & COMPANY, Doing Business as John Deere Company, Appellee

Citations

  • 49 F.3d 1308
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4076
  • 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,463
  • 70 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 521
  • 1995 WL 89925

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating plaintiff “must demonstrate ... that the promotion was given to another person who is not a member of the protected class ”
  • determining comparable qualifications alone does not raise 10 an inference of racial discrimination after consideration of relevant qualifications
  • stating plaintiff “must demonstrate . . . that the promotion was given to another person who is not a member of the protected class”
  • employee not chosen for promotion because of poor relationship with coworkers and violation of company policy
  • employee not chosen for promotion because of poor relationship with co-workers and violation of company policy
  • “We do not sit to determine if this reason is based on sound principles of business judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Lay, Beam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.