· 3/3/1995
Carolyn LIDGE-MYRTIL, Appellant, v. DEERE & COMPANY, Doing Business as John Deere Company, Appellee
Citations
- 49 F.3d 1308
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4076
- 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,463
- 70 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 521
- 1995 WL 89925
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating plaintiff “must demonstrate ... that the promotion was given to another person who is not a member of the protected class ”
- determining comparable qualifications alone does not raise 10 an inference of racial discrimination after consideration of relevant qualifications
- stating plaintiff “must demonstrate . . . that the promotion was given to another person who is not a member of the protected class”
- employee not chosen for promotion because of poor relationship with coworkers and violation of company policy
- employee not chosen for promotion because of poor relationship with co-workers and violation of company policy
- “We do not sit to determine if this reason is based on sound principles of business judgment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollman, Lay, Beam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.