Skip to main content
· 8/23/1972

Carolyn Kiiskila v. United States

Citations

  • 466 F.2d 626
  • 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7802

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding the discretionary function exception applied to government conduct that was “constitutionally repugnant” and in violation of the First Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Cummings, Pell, Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.