Carolyn Freeman v. Scott Busch Gene C. Hildreth John Hatfield Simpson College, Carolyn Freeman v. Scott Busch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court may properly require a party filing an untimely motion to amend to show good cause
• concluding that the district court acted within its discretion in denying a motion to amend the complaint when the plaintiff provided “no reason why [the amendment] could not have” been made earlier
• affirming the district court’s denial of plaintiff’s motion to amend her complaint for failure to show good cause
• affirming denial of motion to amend because movant gave no reason why the amendment could not have been made earlier
• requiring good cause for delay when party files a motion to amend after a deadline in a scheduling. order for amending pleadings
• affirming, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b), the district court’s denial of a motion to amend because the movant offered no reasons “to explain why her motion to amend was filed so late”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).