Carolyn D. Sartor v. Spherion Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiff failed to bring forward evidence of a similarly situated employee because there were “substantial differences in experience” between the plaintiff and an employee offered as a comparator
• “In the context of a business undergoing a substantial reorganization, the fact that the sole black employee at a particular management level was not retained does not itself signal that the company was motivated to fire her because of her race.”
• requiring them to be “directly comparable in all material respects”
• “In the context of a business under- going a substantial reorganization, the fact that the sole No. 07-1989 15 black employee at a particular management level was not retained does not itself signal that the company was motivated to fire her because of her race.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).