Carolyn Burton v. Class Counsel and Party to Arb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because “the FAA compels the conclusion that the grounds for vacatur of an arbitration award may not be supplemented, it also compels the conclusion that these grounds are not waivable, or subject to elimination by contract”
• explaining that standard is a judicial gloss on § 10(a)(4)
• “Through § 10 of the [Federal Arbitration Act], Congress attempted to preserve due process while still promoting the ultimate goal of speedy dispute resolution.” (citing Kyocera Corp. v. Prudential-Bache Trade Servs., Inc., 341 F.3d 987, 998 (9th Cir. 2003

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).