Carolyn Burlison v. McDonald's Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing “responsibility” as a duty “which one may or may not ever be called upon to perform”
• repetition of a word “suggests that Congress intended that the word mean only one thing”
• “Because the local authorities controlled the decision, the localities accordingly constitute the appropriate scope for the informational requirements.”
• district court’s interpretation of a federal statute is reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).