Carollo v. Cement & Concrete Workers District Council Pension Plan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• positing that plaintiffs claims “accrued at the earliest on [the date] when the Board informed him” of the amount of his monthly pension
• “the six-year statute of limitations begins to run each year the fiduciaries maintain the plan in violation of their duties”
• “Plan participants ha[d] no opportunity to be heard in a pending application for a favorable determination letter from the Service.”
• “The percentage is considered the ‘rate’; the average monthly pay constitutes the ‘base.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).