Caroline Hennessy v. Daniels Law Office Richard S. Daniels, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding defendant’s offer ambiguous because the word “judgment” was unclear; nevertheless, the agreement was still enforceable because the plaintiff unambiguously accepted it, without question or qualification
• explaining an offer of judgment is generally treated as an offer to make a contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).