Skip to main content
· 7/29/1983

Caroline Dufrin v. Oakland County Sheriff Johannes Spreen

Citations

  • 712 F.2d 1084
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25351

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • visual body cavity search did not violate the Fourth Amendment rights of woman arrested for felonious assault
  • “It is not necessary for us to determine whether Tinetti and Logan were correctly decided,” distinguishing both cases because they involve minor offenses while Dufrin was arrested for felonious assault
  • inmate would come into contact with general population
  • inmate would come into contact with general population

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lively, Engel, Weick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.