Skip to main content
· 10/11/2012

Caroline Beard v. Miguel Uriostegui

Citations

  • 426 S.W.3d 178
  • 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 8553
  • 2012 WL 4841609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the pro se defendant’s letter to the court was held to be a sufficient answer where it identified the case number, the style of the case, and the parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Radack, Bland, Huddle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.