· 10/11/2012
Caroline Beard v. Miguel Uriostegui
Citations
- 426 S.W.3d 178
- 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 8553
- 2012 WL 4841609
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the pro se defendant’s letter to the court was held to be a sufficient answer where it identified the case number, the style of the case, and the parties
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Radack, Bland, Huddle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.