Caroline Beard v. Miguel Uriostegui

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the pro se defendant’s letter to the court was held to be a sufficient answer where it identified the case number, the style of the case, and the parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rhojo Enterprises, LLC D/B/A Orion Recovery v. Andrew James Stevens
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2018-02-01· cited 12×
• Tunad Enterprises, Inc. v. Martin Palma D/B/A Liz Pizza
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2018-06-27
• In the Interest of J.G., a Child v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2023-02-23
• Cory Lee Hale v. Attorney General of Texas, Tiffany Amanda Randall
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2023-02-28
• Unger Texas Stone, LP and Shelia Marie Unger v. Deere Credit, Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2026-04-16

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• LBL Oil Co. v. International Power Services, Inc.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1989-09-20· cited 243×
• Wilson v. Wilson
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2004-02-26· cited 99×
• Smith v. Lippmann
  Texas Supreme Court· 1992-04-22· cited 99×
• In Re the Marriage of Runberg
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2005-01-12· cited 44×
• Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Co. v. Rapid Settlements, Ltd.
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2008-12-18· cited 25×
• Harris v. Harris
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1993-03-25· cited 11×