Carolina Trucks & Equipment, Inc. v. Volvo Trucks of North America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that state cannot “seize upon ... in-state commercial activities” to regulate “companies’ out-of-state conduct”
• “In construing a state law, we look to the rules of construction applied by the enacting state’s highest court.”
• “By reaching this holding as a matter of statutory construction, we avoid constitutional problems inherent in a broader interpretation of South Carolina law.”
• “By reaching this holding as a matter of statutory construction, we avoid constitutional problems inherent in a broader interpretation of South Carolina law.”
• “By reaching this holding as a matter of statutory construction, we avoid constitutional problems inherent in a broader interpretation of South Carolina law.”
• “By reaching this holding as a matter of statutory construction, we avoid constitutional problems inherent in a broader interpretation of South Carolina law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).