Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Uranex

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• weighing that the defendant “has no other assets within the United States” in favor of exercising jurisdiction over attached funds
• weighing that “the presence of the debt [derives] necessarily from the dealings between” the defendant and a California company in favor of exercising jurisdiction in California

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).