Skip to main content
· 1/31/2005

Carolina Casualty Insurance Company, Intervenor/plaintiff-Appellant v. E.C. Trucking

Citations

  • 396 F.3d 837
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 1485
  • 2005 WL 196661

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “‘It is well-established that the primary purpose of the MCS-90 is to assure that injured members of the public are able to obtain judgments from negligent authorized interstate carriers.’”
  • “‘It is well-established that the primary purpose of the MCS-90 is to assure that injured members of the public are able to obtain judgments from negligent authorized interstate carriers.’”
  • “Although it is not favored, a district court may enter judgment sua sponte so long as the losing party is given notice and an opportunity to be heard on the underlying issues.” (citing Jones v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 302 F.3d 735, 740 (7th Cir. 2002))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Rovner, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.