Carolina Acquisition, LLC v. Double Billed, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Federal Judges are not archaeologists. We possess neither the luxury nor the inclination to sift through [a] mound of obfuscation in hopes of finding” the pertinent information
• “Federal judges are not archaeologists....We possess neither the luxury nor the inclination to sift through that mound of obfuscation in hopes of finding a genuine issue of material fact to deny summary judgment[]”
• “Federal judges are not archaeologists. ... We possess neither the luxury nor the inclination to sift through that mound of obfuscation in hopes of finding a genuine issue of material fact to deny summary judgment.”
• “Federal judges are not archaeologists. We possess neither the luxury nor the inclination to sift through that mound of obfuscation in hopes of finding a genuine issue of material fact to deny summary judgment.” (citation omitted)
• “Federal judges are not archaeologists. . . . We possess neither the luxury nor the inclination to sift through that mound of obfuscation in hopes of finding a genuine issue of material fact to deny summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).