Carole O'LOghLin v. County of Orange

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a debtor who engages in postpetition illegal discriminatory con-duct can be held liable for that conduct, even if claims for similar illegal discrimina-tory conduct occurring before the bank-ruptcy were discharged
• holding that a claim based on illegal conduct after discharge not barred by discharge
• holding that a claim based on illegal conduct after discharge not barred by discharge
• holding that a debtor who engages in postpetition illegal discriminatory conduct can be held liable for that conduct, even if claims for similar illegal discriminatory conduct occurring before the bankruptcy were discharged
• holding that a debtor who engages in postpetition illegal discriminatory conduct can be held liable for that conduct, even if claims for similar illegal discriminatory conduct occurring before the bankruptcy were discharged
• holding that, where an employer was a covered entity under the Americans with Disabilities Act after bankruptcy, a “claim that the [employer] violated the [Disabilities Act] after” confirmation was not discharged by the confirmation order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).