Carol v. Roth v. Koppers Industries, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that unreviewed findings of Pennsylvania state agency “may not be given issue preclusive effect in a subsequent Title VII action”
• unreviewed findings of state unemployment compensation review board are not entitled to preclusive effect in subsequent employment discrimination actions under Title VII
• state unemployment agency’s ruling that employee had just cause to resign was not entitled to preclusive effect, in part because “unreviewed administrative agency findings can never be accorded preclusive effect in subsequent Title VII proceedings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).