Carol L. Robinson v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff could not show causation because the decisionmakers were unaware of the plaintiff engaging in protected activity
• holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to compel when the moving party does not make a good faith effort to resolve the issue without court intervention
• holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to compel when the moving party does not make a good faith effort to resolve the issue without court intervention
• holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to compel when the moving party does not make a good faith effort to resolve the issue without court intervention
• holding that a district court does not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to compel when the moving party does not make a good faith effort to resolve the issue without court intervention
• concluding that district court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion to compel discovery where movant failed to show parties attempted to confer to resolve discovery request, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 and local rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).