· 7/23/2013
Carol Gray v. United States
Citations
- 723 F.3d 795
- 2013 WL 3796243
- 112 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5330
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 14873
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the exhaustion requirement under 26 U.S.C. § 7433(d) is a prerequisite to filing a refund suit in district court
- describing exhaustion as “a condition on the government’s waiver of sovereign immunity” and as an “affirmative defense”
- describing exhaustion as “a condition on the government’s waiver of sovereign immunity” and as an “affirmative defense”
- discussing the difference between exhaustion requirements that are jurisdictional and those that are not
- affirming legality of regulations requiring exhaustion before plaintiff can file suit
- “Although a plaintiff must exhaust administrative remedies to recover damages under § 7433, exhaustion is not a jurisdictional requirement.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaum, Wood, Hamilton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.