Carol Anstett, Kimberly K. Armstrong, William A. Bauer v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, based on other plan provisions, that an employer \knew how\ to limit certain benefits when it so intended
• holding, based on other plan provisions, that an employer “knew how” to limit certain benefits when it so intended
• \the claim for separation benefits [under this ERISA plan] is really a claim to enforce a contract\
• employees employed by successor 18 after sale entitled to severance pay despite no loss of employment because policy not conditioned upon period of unemployment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).