· 9/3/1999
Carnival Brand Seafood Co. v. Carnival Brands, Inc.
Citations
- 187 F.3d 1307
- 51 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1929
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 21023
- 1999 WL 688053
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the “very existence of the ‘related goods’ or ‘natural expansion’ doctrine contemplates that . . . the senior user may reasonably expand into related goods”
- finding fifth factor was neutral where “the evidence showed little with respect to advertising by either party in the critical time frame”
- addressing claims under §§ 1114 and 1125
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Marcus, Mills
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.