Skip to main content
· 9/3/1999

Carnival Brand Seafood Co. v. Carnival Brands, Inc.

Citations

  • 187 F.3d 1307
  • 51 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1929
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 21023
  • 1999 WL 688053

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “very existence of the ‘related goods’ or ‘natural expansion’ doctrine contemplates that . . . the senior user may reasonably expand into related goods”
  • finding fifth factor was neutral where “the evidence showed little with respect to advertising by either party in the critical time frame”
  • addressing claims under §§ 1114 and 1125

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Marcus, Mills

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.