Carney v. Olmsted Operator, L.L.C.
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 1585
Syllabus
Probate common pleas jurisdiction guardianship visitation motion to dismiss subject-matter jurisdiction exclusive jurisdiction. Affirmed common pleas court's dismissal of an action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The complaint filed in the common pleas court raised claims pertaining to visitation rights. At the time the complaint was filed, guardianship proceedings were pending in the probate court, which had exclusive jurisdiction over all matters touching the guardianship, including visitation.
Judges: S. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pratts v. HurleyOhio Supreme Court· 2004-05-05· cited 432×
- Corron v. CorronOhio Supreme Court· 1988-12-14· cited 135×
- State ex rel. Ohio Civ. Serv. Emps. Assn. v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-02-11· cited 97×
- Groza-Vance v. VanceOhio Court of Appeals· 2005-07-28· cited 69×
- Ohio High School Athletic Assn. v. Ruehlman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-07-16· cited 49×
- In re Guardianship of JadwisiakOhio Supreme Court· 1992-07-15· cited 46×
- In re Guardianship of HollinsOhio Supreme Court· 2007-09-19· cited 38×
- Ostanek v. Ostanek (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-07-13· cited 35×
- Rheinhold v. ReichekOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-01-09· cited 13×
- State ex rel. Duncan v. Am. Transm. Sys., Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-02-09· cited 12×
- In re Guardianship of BakhtiarOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-20· cited 6×
- Guardianship of BasistaOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-14· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.