Carney v. Lindsey's Heirs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a non-party was a necessary party because the non-party expressed interest in the subject matter of the litigation through a demand letter
• “interest in potential life has not been extended... to imposing procedures taken after the pregnancy has been terminated like the fetal tissue disposition provisions do” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
• “For purposes of ruling on the motion brought under Rule 12(b)(6), the Court does not consider those matters offered by the parties in support of their brief that are outside the Complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).